Journal article
M. Brewster, Brandon L. Velez, Elizabeth F. Geiger, J. Sawyer
Journal of counseling and psychology, 2019
Journal of counseling and psychology, 2019
Semantic Scholar
DOI
PubMed
Cite
Cite
APA
Click to copy
Brewster, M., Velez, B. L., Geiger, E. F., & Sawyer, J. (2019). It's like herding cats: Atheist minority stress, group involvement, and psychological outcomes. Journal of Counseling and Psychology.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Brewster, M., Brandon L. Velez, Elizabeth F. Geiger, and J. Sawyer. “It's like Herding Cats: Atheist Minority Stress, Group Involvement, and Psychological Outcomes.” Journal of counseling and psychology (2019).
MLA
Click to copy
Brewster, M., et al. “It's like Herding Cats: Atheist Minority Stress, Group Involvement, and Psychological Outcomes.” Journal of Counseling and Psychology, 2019.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{m2019a,
title = {It's like herding cats: Atheist minority stress, group involvement, and psychological outcomes.},
year = {2019},
journal = {Journal of counseling and psychology},
author = {Brewster, M. and Velez, Brandon L. and Geiger, Elizabeth F. and Sawyer, J.}
}
Abstract
Using minority stress theory with a sample of 522 atheist people from the United States, the present study examined the associations of discrimination, proximal minority stressors (stigma consciousness, internalized antiatheism, outness as atheist), and atheist group involvement with psychological distress and self-esteem. Atheist group involvement was associated positively with outness and self-esteem, and negatively with discrimination. Structural equation modeling indicated that discrimination and stigma consciousness yielded significant positive direct relations with distress, whereas outness yielded a significant negative direct relation with distress. Relatedly, discrimination yielded a significant negative direct relation with self-esteem and outness yielded a significant positive direct relation with self-esteem. There was a significant positive unique indirect relation of antiatheist discrimination with distress via the mediating role of stigma consciousness, but no other proximal variables. Multigroup invariance testing of this model did not yield evidence that the pattern of relations of the minority stressors with mental health outcomes differed significantly between participants who were and who were not involved in an atheist group. Implications of these findings for research, practice, and advocacy are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).